首页> 外文OA文献 >Large Sample Bounds on the Survivor Average Causal Effect in the Presence of a Binary Covariate with Conditionally Ignorable Treatment Assignment
【2h】

Large Sample Bounds on the Survivor Average Causal Effect in the Presence of a Binary Covariate with Conditionally Ignorable Treatment Assignment

机译:在存在条件可忽略的治疗分配的二元协变量存在下,大样本样本对幸存者平均因果效应的界线

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A common problem when conducting an experiment or observational study for the purpose of causal inference is “censoring by death,” in which an event occurring during the experiment causes the desired outcome value – such as quality of life (QOL) – not to be defined for some subjects. One approach to this is to estimate the Survivor Average Causal Effect (SACE), which is the difference in the mean QOL between the treated and control arms, considering only those individuals who would have had well-defined QOL regardless of whether they received the treatment of interest, where the treatment is imposed by the researcher in an experiment or by the subject in the case of an observational study. Zhang and Rubin [5] (Estimation of causal effects via principal stratification when some outcomes are truncated by “death”. J Educ Behav Stat 2003;28:353–68) have proposed a methodology to calculate large sample bounds – bounds on the SACE that assume that the exact QOL distribution for each arm is known or that the finite sample size can be ignored – in the case of a randomized experiment. We examine a modification of these bounds in the case where a binary covariate describing each of the subjects is available and assignment to the treatment or control group is ignorable conditional on the covariate. Using a dataset involving an employment training program, we find that the use of the covariate does not substantially change the bounds in this case, although it does weaken the assumptions about the sample and thus make the bounds more widely applicable. However, simulations show that the use of a binary covariate can in some cases dramatically narrow the bounds. Extensions and generalizations to more complicated variants of this situation are discussed, although the amount of computation increases very quickly as the number of covariates and the number of possible values of each covariate increase.
机译:为了进行因果推断而进行实验或观察性研究时,常见的问题是“按死亡检查”,其中在实验过程中发生的事件导致预期的结果值(例如生活质量(QOL))未定义对于某些主题。一种方法是估计幸存者平均因果效应(SACE),这是被治疗组和对照组之间平均QOL的差异,仅考虑那些具有明确QOL的个体,无论他们是否接受治疗如果研究是在实验中由研究人员实施的,或者在观察性研究中是由受试者实施的。 Zhang and Rubin [5](当某些结果被“死亡”截断时,通过主分层来估计因果效应。JEduc Behav Stat 2003; 28:353–68)提出了一种计算大样本范围(SACE范围)的方法。在随机实验的情况下,假设每个臂的确切QOL分布已知,或者可以忽略有限的样本量。在描述每个受试者的二元协变量可用并且以协变量为条件可忽略对治疗或对照组的分配的情况下,我们研究了这些界限的修改。使用涉及就业培训计划的数据集,我们发现在这种情况下,尽管协变量确实削弱了关于样本的假设,但并没有实质性地改变界限,因此使界限更广泛地适用。但是,仿真显示,在某些情况下,使用二进制协变量可以极大地缩小范围。讨论了这种情况下更复杂的变体的扩展和概括,尽管随着协变量的数量和每个协变量的可能值的数量的增加,计算量会迅速增加。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号